Melbourne ResearchAnimal Ethics

Ten Top Tips for Animal Ethics Application Success

2. Writing for a non-scientific audience

AECs are constituted of both scientific and lay members, and decisions about applications must be made on the basis of all-member consensus. Submissions that are unduly complex, or are loaded with dense scientific jargon and abbreviations, make it difficult for lay (and sometimes scientific) members to understand the purpose of the study, and the overall impact of the procedures on animals.

The application project summary, which includes the background/context, statement of aims and description of what will be done to the animals, must be expressed in plain English that is readily understandable to an interested, intelligent person without a scientific background. The title should also be concise and similarly expressed in lay language.

In other sections of the application, such as the more detailed project description, the proposal should also be expressed in plain English, as far as is possible. Where this cannot be achieved, specialist terms should be defined where they first appear within the text, or a lay definition should be included in the glossary. The use of a medical/scientific dictionary is useful for this purpose. As well as avoiding unnecessary complexity, applicants should also:

Further resources:

Online Medical Dictionary (Merriam Webster)

<< Back |Contents| Forward >>

top of page